On July 16th, 2012, Rick Cavallaro was at the controls as the Blackbird land yacht, powered only by the wind, accelerated from a stop to 20 mph. However, the 10 mph breeze was blowing directly in his face for the entire run, giving the Thin Air team the first North American Land Sailing Association (NALSA) record for traveling directly upwind at a speed faster than the wind itself.
This new record has attracted far less attention and controversy than Blackbird’s spectacular downwind speed record, set in 2010. But some people still believe both runs were faked. While the ideas that the wind could push against itself or push something faster than itself seem obviously impossible, I’m confident that this is not a hoax, and I arrogantly believe I can explain upwind and downwind carts to my fellow Toasters. [1]
Simplifications and Assumptions:
– The vehicle always moves to the right in the illustrations.
– The blade profile always moves down in the illustrations.
– The efficiency of the blade decreases linearly with speed. The efficiency of a real blade will rise to and then fall away from a peak efficiency at some non-zero speed.
– Even the weird arrowheads indicate direction.
When sailing directly upwind from a stop, the wind blows on the front of the Blackbird, and tries to push it backwards. Ratchets in the wheels prevent this. The turbine [2] is free to turn, just like blowing on a pinwheel. The turbine blades force the wind to change direction, which creates both a torque force and a drag force. The turbine is geared to the wheels, and as long as the torque reaction at the wheels is greater than the total drag, the craft will accelerate forward.
When the Blackbird is moving upwind, the vehicle speed and the tangential speed of a turbine blade are added to the ambient wind to create an apparent wind, which is the Galilean equivalent that would create the same forces if the blade was perfectly still [3]. The apparent wind is still forced to change direction by the blade. Compared to the stopped cart, this makes less torque relative to drag, and the land yacht will not accelerate as hard. Once the torque reaction at the wheels is equal to the total drag, the craft will maintain speed. If the wind slows, and the total drag is greater than the torque reaction at the wheels, the craft will decelerate.
To get more power out of the wind, the Blackbird’s blades are are formed into airfoils. They still cause the wind to change direction. But now, the torque and drag generated by low pressure air following the convex side are added to the forces from the high pressure stream flowing against the concave side.
Running the Blackbird directly downwind is only slightly different. The key to the whole concept is that the wheels now drive a propeller, instead of a turbine driving the wheels. Furthermore, the illustrations show that the orientation of the blades is reversed. [4][5]
Starting out, the wind pushes on the back of the Blackbird and makes it roll forward. The wheels make the propeller turn, and each blade sees an apparent wind. The blade changes the direction of the apparent wind. Guiding the air backward creates thrust and a resistant torque. As long as the thrust is greater than the torque reaction needed by the wheels to turn the propeller, the vehicle will accelerate forward.
As vehicle speed increases, the apparent wind at each blade is increased and rotated. This makes less thrust relative to the torque needed to turn the propeller, so acceleration will decrease until the Blackbird eventually reaches its top speed.
All of this obeys the laws of conservation of energy. In the upwind case, the craft gets energy by using the wind to turn the turbine. For the downwind case, the next illustration shows how a tailwind pushes on the back of the propeller, even when the vehicle is moving forward faster than the wind.
Moving directly forward, an object going faster than the wind experiences a headwind. No one is disputing this. However, when an object moves across the wind, even with a parallel component greater than wind speed, the apparent wind comes from the side, and pushes on the object along the dotted line. Even though the Blackbird moves faster than the wind, the wind can push on the propeller blades [6] because they move across.
This also shows why the Blackbird can’t push off still air. With no wind, the apparent wind comes only from motion, and will always be a perfectly parallel to the motion. A propeller or a turbine cannot exert enough force on a cart to keep itself turning or moving forward. A propeller needs the extra push, and a turbine needs that extra turn to break even or accelerate. [7]
We’ve done the easy part: looking at something that works and trying to understand why. I wonder what I would have thought in the early discussions. When thought experiments are this hard to understand, much less explain, too often we forget the obvious solution of building a model and trying it out. It was a proud moment when the results of both record attempts were handed down. But I imagine it feels even better to outrun the wind, have it blowing back at you, and use that to go even faster.
[1] This may be asking for trouble. Directly Downwind Faster Than The Wind (DDWFTTW) was one of the most protracted battles between very serious, skeptical, and intelligent people yet seen by the internet. Here is a 60 page thread, and here is an 80 page thread. While I’m usually all for deep-diving with research, I have not read any forum discussions since I first tried to understand the Blackbird back in 2010. For the early history of the debate, I recommend Mark Frauenfelder’s piece for the MAKE Magazine blog.
[2] Pedantically, a turbine converts fluid power into mechanical power, while a propeller converts mechanical power into thrust.
[3] This is an example of using different reference frames for relative motion.
[4] The Blackbird used different optimized blades for each attempt, but reversed the direction of rotation instead of the orientation of the blades.
[5] None of this is Photoshopped. I’m an engineer; I use MSPaint.
[6] Moving across is also required to create the low pressure forces (lift).
[7] That question had me doing the most pacing. I think the gears in my head sheared of some teeth trying to write this paragraph without lapsing into tautology. I am eternally grateful that I wandered across Doc Rampage’s take on it.
Sources And Further Reading:
Main Image: Stephen Morris, via Wikipedia
http://www.nalsa.org/DownWind.html
http://www.fasterthanthewind.org/
What I’ve Learned About Wind Carts – Mark Frauenfelder
One Man’s Quest to Outrace Wind – Adam Fisher There is a good explanation of how Rick Cavallaro originally figured out how to go faster than the wind. Followed by the statement that an airplane on a treadmill will take off normally. One step forward, two steps back.
















"Followed by the statement that an airplane on a treadmill will take off normally. One step forward, two steps back."
Ermmmm…an airplane will take off normally even if wheel speed is matched by a treadmill.
I apologize for not following the links and seeing what specifically the treadmill was doing. I assumed it was the usual plane-in-still-air-rolling-on-conveyor. The point remains that it's airspeed, not ground speed that's important, and it's frustrating when cartoon physics keep getting brought up.
I've got a portable hole for sale. Are you interested?
Instant hole is my favorite cartoon technology we do not yet have.
Another great article skitter! I have to admit that when I first saw the lead picture, I thought it was a gag.
A passive propeller powered vehicle that will accelerate directly into the wind is very counter intuitive. It always gives my brain a cramp when people build things like this and they work.
Nice article. The following animation uses a similar approach to visualize the opposing forces, and how a forward net thrust can be achieved:
[youtube FqJOVHHf6mQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqJOVHHf6mQ youtube]
This diagram shows the vectors for all possible configurations in different situations:
http://i54.tinypic.com/2gv0kew.png
Interesting that, downwind, a turbine is the most powerful from a stop, while a propeller is necessary to exceed windspeed.
Courtesy embed, click for full size:
<img src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt237/jskitter/Atomic%20Toasters/2gv0kew_zps1ae43e6c.png" width="500">
skitter: "Interesting that, downwind, a turbine is the most powerful from a stop"
That's because here the forces (red, blue) are not opposing each other, but working together. Downwind below windspeed a trubine will create a downwind drag and a downwind force at the wheels. But to get above windspeed you have to switch to propeller mode at some point.
The Blackbird didn't use this turbine mode for the downwind trials. Even though they had variable pitch, the transmission was one way only. But Andrew Bauer who build the first manned DDWFTTW in the 60s was starting in turbine mode, and the switching to propeller (see video below).
[youtube yFPomTq_PRU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFPomTq_PRU youtube]
A while back I had a long discussion with friend about the following thought experiment:
Imagine a vehicle powered by a falling object. The simplest implementation would be a wheeled tower with a rope wound around one of the axles then run up and around a pulley attached to the top of the tower. A heavy weight attached to the rope would fall, resulting in the vehicle moving forward.
Still with me? Now, can such a vehicle travel uphill? For me the answer is an obvious yes. Others were unconvinced. I built a Lego model to demonstrate that it works and some were still uneasy about it…
I can post a short clip of it tonight, if anyone is interested.
I'd like to see it. That is an excellent demonstration of potential energy.
Also, I'm interested in the portable hole you mentioned earlier if it's large enough to park a car.
How about the 'fan on a sailboat'? I think that the forward thrust comes from the air leaking around the sides of the sail.
[youtube 0CrXvOKPymk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CrXvOKPymk youtube]
I agree; I think the sail is acting as a very, very inefficient duct to reverse the direction of the fan's thrust. The fan would be put to much better use powering a generator on top of my car.
I get a quieter fan if I were you. That thing would drive you nuts.
Here is another way to explain it (the downwind part, but upwind is similar):
[youtube UGRFb8yNtBo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGRFb8yNtBo youtube]
Here the vectors for the tacking boat: http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/6694/downwindv…
And here the for propeller blade: http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/4922/propeller…
Sail boats have been travailing down wind and against the wind faster then then wind for some time and to seeing a vehicle on land do it is no surprise… Its just proper application of converting wind power into forward motion…
Conventional sail craft cannot go DIRECTLY downwind faster than wind or DIRECTLY upwind at any speed. Conventional sail craft on water, ice, land can achieve a downwind/upwind velocity made good greater than wind, by TACKING. The novel and (for some) counter intuitive bit here is not it being on land, but that they go in a straight line parallel to the wind all the time.
But the difference here is that the sailboat can't move dead downwind faster than the wind, it has to move at an angle to the wind to go faster than the wind. The cart shown here moves in *exactly* the same direction as the wind, faster than the wind.
The same with upwind: sailboats can't go dead upwind faster than the wind, they can only go fast at an angle to the wind.
**I REALLY** should refresh the screen before replying.
But they can however, if done right, sail pretty dam close to the wind at speeds that are faster then the wind speed.
The NALSA guys know very well what the most efficient ice-boats and land-yachts can achieve. They designed the rules for DDW and DUW records such that no conventional sail craft could achieve faster than wind. To compete in these category you are not allowed to profit from crosswinds. The vehicle must perform best when going parallel to the wind, which is the case for those rotor sail craft.